Hammer and sickle dispute acquires international dimension
An ongoing dispute over whether the communist hammer and sickle symbols belong on a wartime memorial to Russian soldiers who died during the liberation of Brno at the end of the Second World War has stumped Czech officials, divided the inhabitants of Brno and elicited an official protest from Russia.
"A legal expert told us that in this case the presence of a hammer and sickle cannot be viewed as a criminal act - that is promoting an ideology aimed at suppressing human rights and freedoms."
The Russian consulate has sent the Czech Foreign Ministry an official protest note reminding it of its obligation to "protect and preserve war graves" and claiming that tampering with the war memorial was "an unfriendly act towards Russia". The Czech Foreign Ministry promptly issued a statement saying that the Russian complaint was justified and that Mr Pelan had acted in violation of international law; but it stopped short of asking for the hammer and sickle to be put back on the memorial. The Czech Defense Ministry took a stronger stand, saying that the hammer and sickle represented a certain period in history and should be respected within that context. However the mayor of Brno Ivan Kopecny is standing firmly behind his deputy in this conflict:"It is perfectly right that the grave of Red Army soldiers who died liberating Brno should be here and that there is a memorial to them expressing the town's gratitude. There is nothing wrong with the inscription, but the hammer and sickle do not belong there - they are not symbols of the Red Army - they are symbols of communism."
On Wednesday two groups of protesters turned up at the Brno memorial - one came to support the deputy mayor, the other to condemn him for what they described as tactless and insensitive behavior on ground that should be sacred. It is not clear how this sensitive issue will be resolved - but it clearly shows the enormity of the country's dilemma in coming to terms with the past.