Legislation proposal seeks crack down on car wrecks blocking Prague’s parking spaces
On Wednesday, Parliament is expected to discuss a new legislation amendment, which intends to make it easier for district authorities to remove aging car wrecks abandoned in otherwise useful parking spaces. The Ministry of Transport has criticised the amendment, saying it is lacking in a number of areas, but said it is finalising its own legislation proposal.
In Prague 10 for example, there are currently between 100 to 200 vehicles recorded as eligible for removal. The district’s spokesman, Vít Novák, told Czech Radio why the city is not doing so: “We have absolutely no problem paying for the liquidation of the wreck. It would add another parking spot. Financially, it is not an issue. The problem is in the legislation.”
The current law states that only vehicles with severe damage to their “mechanics or construction” classify as wrecks and can therefore be removed. This does not involve vehicles with flat tires or no number plates.
“You often get absurd situations, when for many months, even years, you have a car taking up a parking space while we are unable to even to find out who the owner is”, says the spokesman for Prague 6, Ondřej Šrámek.
Prague 10 spokesman, Vít Novák, says that if legislation were improved up to three quarters of the district’s wrecks could be cleared. Other parts of the capital face the same problem, with dozens of discarded vehicles lining the streets of Prague 4 and Prague 9. The historic centre is also affected by the issue, albeit it seems to a lesser degree.
Markéta Pekarová Adamová, MP and First Vice-Chairwoman of TOP09, one of the smaller centre-right opposition parties, says car wrecks are not just an issue in Prague. “This is a problem affecting many Czech cities and villages and has been overlooked by the Ministry of Transport for a long time.”
However, the proposal has met with disapproval from the Ministry of Transport, which recommended the government vote against the amendment. In a statement published two weeks ago it criticised, among other things, the amendment’s legislative technical deficiencies and that instead of immediately destroying such vehicles, they should be considered for sale first.