Czech president sparks controversy with pardon for country’s most famous prisoner
Arguably the most famous Czech prisoner ever will soon be free after the head of state announced he would grant a pardon to Jiří Kajínek. The announcement has re-sparked the long running debate about whether Kajínek was really a double murderer or the fall guy in a complicated conspiracy.
All the papers have been prepared, according to Zeman. There is one condition though, if Kajínek commits any crime over the next seven years then he will be heading straight back behind bars again to continue his life sentence.
It’s undoubtedly the highest profile and controversial pardon from a president who originally declared himself reluctant to use the head of state’s prerogative because of its dubious use in the past.
A feature film, called simply ‘Kajínek,’ was made of his life and case in 2010, it became the most viewed Czech film in its first weekend in cinemas and was eventually seen by almost 800,000 on the big screen.
That film portrayed him as a highly intelligent criminal and boosted the interpretation that he was a victim or fall guy of a flawed police and judicial system where divide between business, crime, and law and order was more than blurred.
For the facts. Kajínek was given a life sentence in 1998 for the contract killing five years earlier in Plzeň of a businessman, involved in blackmail, and his body guard. The second bodyguard survived the spray of bullets and turned out to be a crucial witness for the prosecution. Kajínek denied the murder charges. By all accounts the case against him was full of holes and littered with inconsistencies with key evidence from the police strangely going missing. After his sentencing, a series of Czech justice ministers highlighted some of these flaw and tried to get the case reopened but without success.
ʺA fundamental problem was how the murderer could have shot the two people. The number of shots did not correspond to the possibility of firing with two guns and the time taken to reload. Police who investigated from the start made a series of mistakes. Evidence disappeared. A dictaphone at the scene of the crime disappeared and was never found although it was originally there. One police officer in the investigative team was on the scene of the crime soon after the murders though there was no way he could have known that they had occurred."